A Retrospective Assessment of The Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in T2dm Patients

  • Aryendu Kumar Saini Department of Pharmacy, Pranveer Singh Institute Of Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India
  • Sunil Verma Academy of Clinical Intelligence, Mohali, Punjab, India
  • Himanshu Bansode Department of Pharmacy, Yash Raj Institute Of Pharmacy, Lucknow, U.P., India
  • Vishal Yadav Department of Pharmacy, United College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India
  • Upendra Kumar Department of Pharmacy, Nand Kishore College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India
  • Byomnath Chaubey Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India
  • Pratima Kushwaha Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India

Abstract

Background: Pioglitazone is a drug that belongs to the category of thiazolidinedione (TZD) and is used for its hypoglycemic activity that is very-well associated with some serious adverse drug reactions (ADR). Previous studies have dealt with country-specific pharmacovigilance databases to assess the ADR profile of pioglitazone but none of them utilized a scholarly literature database.  


Objective: This study was conducted to assess the safety profile of pioglitazone in terms of expectedness, causality, and the seriousness of ADR by using a literature database.


Methods: The published literature cases of pioglitazone-induced ADR from the PubMed database (between 1993 and 2020) were retrieved by using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms.Only the valid cases (as per the ICH validity criteria) were analyzed. Following this, valid cases were further assessed for the expectedness of ADR by using the "Summary of Product Characteristics" document of Takeda Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. Seriousness criteria of WHO for ADR were used for assessing the seriousness of ADR while the Naranjo’s scale was used for causality assessment.


Results: A total of 871 results were found of which only 26 valid ICSRs cases were found. Of the total 168 ADRs, a total of 131 (77.97%) and 37 (22.02%) unexpected and expected ADRs were found. Only two of the events were found to be non-serious and they were Iatrogenic lipomatosis and Angioneurotic edema. 1 (32.5 %), 24 (77.4 %), 6 (19.35 %) reactions were serious due to death, important medical event, and hospitalization, respectively. There were, in total, 7 (27 %) and 19 (74 %) cases that belonged to a possible and probable category, respectively.


Conclusion: It is worth mentioning that pioglitazone is associated with the risk of heart failure and edema besides causing bladder cancer. The patient should be evaluated for the possible adverse effects of proper monitoring and follow-ups.


 

Keywords: Bladder Cancer, Macular Edema, ICH, Pharmacovigilance, Urinary Tract Infection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aryendu Kumar Saini, Department of Pharmacy, Pranveer Singh Institute Of Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India

Department of Pharmacy, Pranveer Singh Institute Of Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India

Sunil Verma, Academy of Clinical Intelligence, Mohali, Punjab, India

Academy of Clinical Intelligence, Mohali, Punjab, India

Himanshu Bansode, Department of Pharmacy, Yash Raj Institute Of Pharmacy, Lucknow, U.P., India

Department of Pharmacy, Yash Raj Institute Of Pharmacy, Lucknow, U.P., India

Vishal Yadav, Department of Pharmacy, United College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India

Department of Pharmacy, United College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India

Upendra Kumar, Department of Pharmacy, Nand Kishore College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India

 Department of Pharmacy, Nand Kishore College Of Pharmacy, Prayagraj, U.P., India

Byomnath Chaubey, Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India

Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India

Pratima Kushwaha, Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India

Department of Pharmacy, Ram Nagina Pharmacy College, Dudhi, U.P., India

References

1. Wu Y. Risk Factors Contributing to Type 2 Diabetes and Recent Advances in the Treatment and Prevention. Int J Med Sci. 2014; 11(11): 1185–1200.
2. Kaveeshwar SA, Cornwall J. The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. Australas Med J. 2014; 7(1): 45–48.
3. Winer N, Sowers JR. Epidemiology of diabetes. J ClinPharmacol. 2004; 44(4):397-405.
4. Cerf ME. Beta Cell Dysfunction and Insulin Resistance. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013; 4: 37.
5. Kahn SE. The Importance of β-Cell Failure in the Development and Progression of Type 2 Diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2019; 86: 4047-4058.
6. Mahler RJ, Adler ML. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Update on Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1999; 84: 1165–1171.
7. Sidiqui A, Ahmad S. Diabetes: Mechanism, Pathophysiology and Management-A Review. Int. J. Drug Dev. & Res. 2013; 5: 1-23.
8. Lin HA. Acilli D. Hormonal Regulation of Hepatic Glucose Production in Health and Disease. The Cell Metabolism. 2011; 14: 9-14.
9. Pandey A, Tripathi P, Pandey R. Alternative therapies useful in the management of diabetes: A systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011; 3(4): 504–512.
10. Marín-Peñalver AA, Martín-Timon I, Sevillano-Collantes C, et al. Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2016; 7: 354–395.
11. Nasri H, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Metformin: Current knowledge. J Res Med Sci. 2014; 19(7): 658–664.
12. Alhaider AA, Korashy HM, Sayed-Ahmed MM. Metformin attenuates streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats through modulation of oxidative stress genes expression. Chem Biol Interact. 2011;192(3):233-42.
13. Buse JB, Dalessio DA, Roting P, et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2019; 41: 2669-01.
14. Pai SA, Kshirsagar NA. Pioglitazone utilization, efficacy & safety in Indian type 2 diabetic patients: A systematic review & comparison with European Medicines Agency Assessment Report. Indian J Med Res. 2016; 144: 672–681.
15. Waugh N, Cummins E, et al. Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010; 14:1-248.
16. Borg JJ, Piroszynski M, et al. Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2011; 34:187-97.
17. Mulkalvar S, Vorlikar PS, Lopamudra B, et al. Pharmacovigilance in India. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2013; 6: 126-31.
18. Berthet S, Olivier P, Montrastuc C, et al. Drug safety of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in France: a study using the French PharmacoVigilance database. BMC ClinPharmacol. 2011; 11: 5.
19. Piccini C, Motola D, Elizabetta P, et al. Assessing the Association of Pioglitazone Use and Bladder Cancer Through Drug Adverse Event Reporting. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(6): 1369–1371.
20. Pontes H, Rollason V, Clement M. Safety signal detection: the relevance of literature review. Drug Saf. 2014;37: 471-9.
21. Pharmacovigilance literature review in the age of precision medicine [Internet]. Adlittle. [Cited 18 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.adlittle.com/sites/default/files/viewpoints/adl_a_new_approach_to_pv_literature_0.pdf
22. Post-Approval Safety Data Management: Definitions And Standards For Expedited Reporting [Internet]. ICH [Cited 18 March 2020]. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2D_Guideline.pdf
23. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. ClinPharmacolTher. 1981;30:239–45.
24. Maeda K. Hepatocellular injury in a patient receiving pioglitazone. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135(4):306.
25. Karakurt F, Kargili A, Kasapoglu B. Pioglitazone induced reversible pancytopenia. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118(2):96-7.
26. May LD, Lefkowitch JH, Kram MT, et al. Mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic liver injury after pioglitazone therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(6):449-52.
27. Starkey H, Baker G, Joba W, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in thyroid eye disease: contraindication for thiazolidinedione use?. J ClinEndocrinolMetab. 2003;88(1):55-9.
28. Niemeyer NV, Janney LM. Thiazolidinedione‐Induced Edema. Pharmacotherapy. 2002; 22: 924-929.
29. Shah M, Fearon WF, Kolandaivel A. Pioglitazone induced heart failure despite normal left ventricular function. Am J Med. 2004;117(12):973-4.
30. Senba H, Kawano M, Kawakami M. Severe decrease in serum HDL-cholesterol during combination therapy of bezafibrate and pioglitazone. J AtherosclerThromb. 2006; 13(5):263-4.
31. Farley-Hills E, Sivasankar R, Martin M. Fatal liver failure associated with pioglitazone. BMJ. 2004; 329(7463):429.
32. Digman C, Klein AK, Pittas AG. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia caused by thiazolidinediones. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143(6):465-6.
33. Marcy, TR, Britton, ML, &Blevin, SM. Second-generation thiazolidinediones and hepatotoxicity. Ann Pharmacother38, no. 9 (2004): 1410
34. Chen YW, Chen YC, Wu CJ, et al. Massive bilateral pleural effusion associated with use of pioglitazone. ClinTher. 2008; 30(8):1485-9.
35. Kermani A, Garg A. Thiazolidinedione-associated congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003 Sep;78(9):1088-91.
36. Hoffmann TK, Parker DL, Buch HA, et al. Suspected suppression of the INR by thiazolidinediones: interaction between warfarin and TZDs. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(5):994-6.
37. Dorkhan M, Dencker M, Frid A. Treatment with pioglitazone induced significant, reversible mitral regurgitation. CardiovascDiabetol. 2008;7:12.
38. Shadid S, Jensen MD. Angioneurotic Edema as a Side Effect of Pioglitazone. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(2): 405-405.
39. Iqbal MB, Fisher NG, Lyne JC, McDonagh TA. Thiazolinediones and heart failure: the potential to precipitate irreversible cardiac dysfunction. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 123(2):e35-7.
40. Kota SK, Tripathy PR, Kota SK. Reversible mitral and aortic regurgitation due to pioglitazone. EndocrPract. 2012;18(2):e32-6.
41. Oshitari T, Asaumi N, Watanabe M, et al. Severe macular edema induced by pioglitazone in a patient with diabetic retinopathy: a case study. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008; 4:1137-40.
42. Slim R, Salem SB, Zamy M, et al. Pioglitazone-Induced Acute Rhabdomyolysis. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(7): e84.
43. Finsterer J, Stöllberger C. Pioglitazone-induced heart failure in a patient with restrictive cardiomyopathy and metabolic myopathy. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009; 98(4):271-4.
44. Femia A, Klein PA. Letter: Iatrogenic lipomatosis: a rare manifestation of treatment with a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist. Dermatol Online J. 2010;16(4):15.
45. Pinto AG, Cummings OW, Chalasani N. Severe but reversible cholestatic liver injury after pioglitazone therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(10):857.
46. Chase MP, Yarze JC. Pioglitazone-associated fulminant hepatic failure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(2):502-3.
47. Mikhail NE, Wali S, Cope D. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(4):571-2.
48. Actos Tablets [Internet]. EMC [Cited 18 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/1287/smpc
49. Saravanan K, Mnta PK, Mohanta GP, et al. A study of adverse drug reaction on drugs used in the management of type 2 diabetic mellitus. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2011; 4:3394-3395.
50. Pharmacovigilance [Internet]. Elsevier [Cited 18 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research/pharmacovigilance
51. The Rise of Pharmacovigilance [Internet]. EBSCO [Cited 18 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.ebsco.com/blog-corporate/article/the-rise-of-pharmacovigilance
Statistics
38 Views | 11 Downloads
How to Cite
Saini, A., Verma, S., Bansode, H., Yadav, V., Kumar, U., Chaubey, B., & Kushwaha, P. (2022). A Retrospective Assessment of The Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in T2dm Patients. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 10(3), 70-77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v10i3.1096