Comparative study of In-process and finished products quality control test for tablet and capsules according to pharmacopoeias

Authors

  • Harishchandra Chavan Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik, Maharastra,India
  • Gurmeet Chhabra Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik, Maharastra,India
  • Nayan Gujarathi Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik, Maharastra,India
  • Anil Jadhav Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nashik, Maharastra,India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v6i3.370

Keywords:

In-process quality control, Pharmaceutical tablets, Pharmaceutical Capsule, Pharmacopoeia

Abstract

The goal of all Pharmaceutical industry is to make a good quality product and for this it is necessary to allow In-Process Quality Control (IPQC) Approaches. In-process quality control tests are done before the manufacturing process is completed. The function of in-process controls is to monitor and if necessary, adaptation of the manufacturing process to achieve the required specification. This may incorporate control of equipment and environment too. In-process materials should be tested for their physical parameters and its quality attributes which are later approved or rejected by the quality control department. The reason of IPQC is to deliver a cumulative finished product by avoiding or eliminating mistakes at every stage in production. The objective of this study is the comparison of In-process quality control test of India Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia and the United state Pharmacopoeia. It was observed from various studies that quality control tests for tablet and capsule listed in different pharmacopoeias   have slight similarities and differences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Amrutha V, Gangadharappa V, Kiran C, and Shuchithra S: In-Process and Finished Products Quality Control Tests for Sterile and Non Sterile Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 2017; 40: 206-214.
2. Balamuralidhara V Teja CH, S. Vinay, Bhat Sudeendra R and TM Pramod Kumar: Comparative study of in-process and finished products quality control test of Indian pharmacopoeia British pharmacopoeia United State pharmacopoeia for capsule and liquid oral. International Research Journal of Pharmacy 2011; 2(9): 65-69.
3. Uddin Md Sahab, Al Mamun Abdullah, Tasnu Tanjuma and Asaduzzaman Md.: In-Process and Finished Products Quality Control Tests for Pharmaceutical Tablets according to Pharmacopoeias. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2015 ; 7(9): 180-185
4. Rajpurohit Sanjay, Suthar Narayan, and Choudhary Manupriya: In-Process Quality Control (IPQC): A Review. International journal of Applied Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 2017; 2(6): 29-32
5. L Lachman, HA Lieberman, and JL Kanig: The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Varghese publishing house 3rd Edition, 1986; 296-300.
6. Unites States Pharmacopoeia Convention. United States Pharmacopoeia 38-National Formulary 33, Stationery Office, USA, 2010
7. British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia, 13th Edition, Stationery Office, Great Britain, 2013
8. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia. 7th edition, Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission; 2007
9. Mathur N, Kumar R, Tiwari K, Singh S, and Fatima N: World. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutics Science 2015; 4(7): 979 -984.
10. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. European Pharmacopoeia, 8th Edition, Council of Europe, Europe, 2013.
11. Society of Japanese Pharmacopoeia. Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 16th Edition, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan, 2011.
12. LV Allen, NG Popovich, and HC Ansel. Ansels Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery systems. 9th edition. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
13. Bhatt B, Agrawal S.S: Pharmaceutical technology: capsules 2007; 1-26.
14. Raslan MA, Elshamry HG, Elshamry NR, Elshamry HA, Elshahry AH, Elrwely ME: Quality Control Tests for Solid Dosage Forms (Review article) 2013 ; 1-17
15. P Tangri, P Mamgain, Shaffi, AML Verma, and Lakshmayya International. Journal of Indian. Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 2014; 1(1): 49-51.
16. Mazumder B, Bhattacharya S, and Yadav A : Total Quality Management in Pharmaceuticals: A Review 2011 ; 3 : 365-375
17. LVA Jr. Remington: Introduction to Pharmacy; Pharmaceutical Press UK; 1st Edition, 2013; 146.
18. Jatto Elsie and O. Augustine: An Overview of Pharmaceutical Validation and Process control in drug development 2002 ; 1(2): 115-122
19. Deshmukh MT, Salunkhe RS, Deshmukh VT, and Shete RV: Quality Control Tests for Parenteral Preparations: A Review. Journal of Current Pharma Research 2015; 5(2): 1425-30.
20. Podczeck Fridrun, and Jones Brian E.: Pharmaceutical capsule; pharmaceutical press UK ;Second edition 2004; 89-90 & 239-258
21. Verma A & Tyagi P: In Process Quality Control: A Review. International Journal of Industrial Pharmacy and Bio Sciences; 2014; 1; 48-59.

Published

2018-07-10

How to Cite

Chavan, H., Chhabra, G., Gujarathi, N., & Jadhav, A. (2018). Comparative study of In-process and finished products quality control test for tablet and capsules according to pharmacopoeias. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 6(3), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v6i3.370

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2018): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3 MAY -JUNE 2018

Section

Review Articles

AUTHORS WHO PUBLISH WITH THIS JOURNAL AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).