Stem Cell Therapy Used For Treatment of Heart Disease
Abstract
Heart disease continues to be the foremost cause of death globally, largely due to the heart’s limited capacity for self-repair following injury. Conventional treatments, such as pharmacological therapy, mechanical support, and surgical interventions, primarily manage symptoms and slow disease progression but cannot regenerate damaged myocardium. In recent years, stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising regenerative strategy aimed at restoring cardiac structure and function. Various stem cell types—including embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs)—have shown potential to promote myocardial regeneration through differentiation into cardiomyocytes, stimulation of angiogenesis, and paracrine signaling mechanisms. Preclinical studies have demonstrated improved ventricular function and reduced infarct size, while clinical trials have reported modest yet encouraging functional recovery in patients with ischemic heart disease. However, several challenges limit widespread clinical application, including poor cell survival and engraftment, immune rejection, risk of arrhythmogenesis and tumorigenicity, and ethical concerns regarding cell sources. Recent advances in tissue engineering, gene editing, and exosome-based cell-free therapies may help overcome these limitations. This review highlights the current progress, therapeutic potential, and major challenges of stem cell-based therapies in cardiac repair, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols and long-term clinical evaluation to achieve safe and effective translation into clinical practice.
Downloads
References
Lieberman H, Rieger M, Banker GS, editors Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: disperse systems. 2 nd ed. CRC Press; 2019.
Aulton ME, Taylor K, editors. Aulton's pharmaceutics: the design and manufacture of medicines. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
Allen LV, Popovich NG, Ansel HC. Ansel ‘ s Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. p. 312-27.
Takatori T, Yamamoto K, Yamaguchi T, Higaki K, kimura T. Design of controlled release morphine suppositories containing poly glycerol ester of fatty acid. Biol Pharm Bull, 2005; 28:1480-1484.
Moghimipour E, Ali MD, Fatemeh MA. Characterization and in-vitro evaluation of piroxicam suppositories. Asian J Pharm 2009; 2(3): 92-8.
Vijay D. Havaldar, Adhikrao V. Yadav, Remeth J. Dias, Kailas K. Mali, Vishwajeet S. Ghorpade, Nitin H. Salunkhe. Rectal suppository as an effective alternative for oral administration. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(6):759-766.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374708622_Modern_Aspects_of_Suppositories_A_Review
https://gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscbps/site s/default/files/GSCBPS-2023-0429.pdf8]
De Boer AG, Moolenaar F, De Leede LG, Breimer DD. Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1982 Aug;7:285-311.
Lieberman H, Rieger M, Banker GS, editors Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: disperse systems. 2 nd ed. CRC Press; 2019.
https://pharmlabs.unc.edu/labexercises/compo unding/suppositories/
Christine Edwards. Physiology of the colorectal barrier. Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews. 1997; 2: 173-190.
Vijay D. Havaldar, Adhikrao V. Yadav, Remeth J. Dias, Kailas K. Mali, Vishwajeet S. Ghorpade, Nitin H. Salunkhe. Rectal suppository as an effective alternative for oral administration. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(6): 759-766
Ham AS, Buckheit Jr RW. Designing and developing suppository formulations for anti-HIV drug delivery. Therapeutic Delivery. 2017 Aug;8(9):805-17.
Susan Hua. Physiological and pharmaceutical considerations for rectal drug formulations. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019; 10: 1196.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374708622_Modern_Aspects_of_Suppositories_A_ Review
Lachman Leon, Lieberman H., The Theory and practise of industrial pharmacy, CBS Publisher and distributor, New Delhi, Fourth edition1, 142013, 744-769.
Purohit, T. J., Hanning, S. M., and Wu, Z. (2018). Advances in rectal drug delivery systems. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018; 23 (10): 942–952.
Lo YL, Lin Y, Lin HR. Evaluation of epirubicin in thermogelling and bioadhesive liquid and solid suppository formulations for rectal administration. Int. J. of Molecular Sci. 2014; 15: 342-360.
Ali MA. Preparation and In vitro Evaluation of Paracetamol and Metoclopramide HCl Double-layered Suppositories for Migraine Treatment. Journal of American Science. 2017;13(4).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahale Nikita S, Chothave Sayali J, Muthe Sakshi S, Barokar Pooja G, Kapadi Suvarna S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
AUTHORS WHO PUBLISH WITH THIS JOURNAL AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.