Mapping of Community Pharmacy Practices in Padangsidimpuan City

  • Cory, L F H Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Wiryanto W Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Khairunnisa K Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Abstract

Objective: to find out the conditions of practice and mapping related to the category of community pharmacy practices in Padangsidimpuan City.


Methods: The study was conducted by distributing assessment rubrics directly to 30 pharmacists in charge of pharmacies in the city of Padangsidimpuan. Data is the identity and choice of respondents for 2 or 3 descriptions of the level of compliance with each three-point scale; 0, 2 and 4 for each element. The level of fulfillment of standards consists of 7 categories based on cumulative points, and based on the average of points from each of the 5 standard aspects, including; professionalism, managerial, dispensing, pharmaceutical care, and public health services, depicted in spider web diagrams. This research was conducted in August - October 2019.


Results: Mapping the results of the pharmacy practice category to 30 community pharmacy practices in Padangsidimpuan, among others: 8 pharmacies received excellent categories, 5 pharmacies of good categories, 3 pharmacies of adequate categories, 3 pharmacies of poor categories, 5 pharmacies of substandard categories, 5 pharmacies of the category not feasible, 1 category pharmacy is not very feasible.Conclusion: The average level of compliance with pharmacy practice standards in the city of Padangsidimpuan is included in the sub-standard category. Based on the average standard aspect points, professionalism has less categories, managerial has enough categories, dispensing enough categories, and pharmaceutical care is lacking categories and public health services have sub-standard categories.  

Keywords: Mapping, Community Pharmacy, Practice Category

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cory, L F H, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Wiryanto W, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Khairunnisa K, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

References

1. FIP.Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) In Developing Countries. The Hague, The Netherlands: FIP Guidelines. September 1998.
2. Menkes RI. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI Nomor 9 Tahun 2017tentang Apotek. Jakarta: Berita Negara RI.
3. Kwando, R R . Pemetaan Peran Apoteker dalam Pekayanan Kefarmasian Terkait Frekuensi Kehadiran Apoteker Di Paotek Di Surabaya Timur. Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya. 2014; 3(1).
4. Wiryanto. (2014). Model Konseptual Revitalisasi Praktik Farmasi Komunitas di Indonesia. Disertasi. Medan: Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Farmasi, Fakultas Farmasi USU.
5. Wiryanto, Harahap, U., dan Karsono. Profil Kinerja Praktik Farmasi Komunitas/Apotek di Indonesia.Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Farmasi, Medan, 29 September 2012.
6. Dominica Dwi, Dedi P.P, Yulihasri. (2016). Pengaruh Kehadiran Apoteker Terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian Di Apotek Di Kota Padang.Jurnal Sains Farmasi & Klinis, Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia, Sumatera Barat. 2016; 3(1):99-107.
7. Prabanda, S., dan P, A R. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan pelayanan Kefarmasian di Apotek Wilayah Kota Tegal; Tahun 2018 (Berdasarkan Permenkes No. 35 Tahun 2014).2019; l 8(1):65 – 71.
Statistics
185 Views | 214 Downloads
How to Cite
H, C., W, W., & K, K. (2020). Mapping of Community Pharmacy Practices in Padangsidimpuan City. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 8(1), 42-46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22270/ajprd.v8i1.657